Spiegl Online published a balanced article by Olaf Stampf on the global warming crisis. Make sure to read it. Here’s an excerpt:

Largely unnoticed by the public, climate researchers are currently embroiled in their own struggle over who owns the truth. While some have always seen themselves as environmental activists aiming to shake humanity out of its complacency, others argue for a calmer and more rational approach to the unavoidable.

One member of the levelheaded camp is Hans von Storch, 57, a prominent climate researcher who is director of the Institute for Coastal Research at the GKSS Research Center in Geesthacht in northern Germany. "We have to take away people’s fear of climate change," Storch told DER SPIEGEL in a recent interview. "Unfortunately many scientists see themselves too much as priests whose job it is to preach moralistic sermons to people."

Keeping a cool head is a good idea because, for one thing, we can no longer completely prevent climate change. No matter how much governments try to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, it will only be possible to limit the rise in global temperatures to about 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) by the end of the century. But even this moderate warming would likely have far fewer apocalyptic consequences than many a prophet of doom would have us believe.

For one thing, the more paleontologists and geologists study the history of the earth’s climate, the more clearly do they recognize just how much temperatures have fluctuated in both directions in the past. Even major fluctuations appear to be completely natural phenomena.

Additionally, some environmentalists doubt that the large-scale extinction of animals and plants some have predicted will in fact come about. "A warmer climate helps promote species diversity," says Munich zoologist Josef Reichholf.

Also, more detailed simulations have allowed climate researchers to paint a considerably less dire picture than in the past — gone is the talk of giant storms, the melting of the Antarctic ice shield and flooding of major cities.

Improved regionalized models also show that climate change can bring not only drawbacks, but also significant benefits, especially in northern regions of the world where it has been too cold and uncomfortable for human activity to flourish in the past. However it is still a taboo to express this idea in public.

5 responses to ““Not the End of the World As We Know It””

  1. Oliver K. Manuel Avatar

    Global warming is a challenge to the scientific community because the public may lose faith in science.

    Earth’s climate is controlled by a Power far greater than science.

    Leaders of the scientific community want us to believe that carbon dioxide, CO2, causes global warming. They can control CO2. But they cannot control the Power that determines Earth’s climate.

    The Sun controls Earth’s climate.

    The scientific community has deceived the public by claiming that the Sun is a ball of hydrogen (H) with a steady, well-behaved H-fusion reactor at its core.

    That is not true [1-4].

    The Sun is a magnetic diffuser that selectively moves lightweight atoms like hydrogen to its surface and then discards them in the solar wind [1].

    Hydrogen is “smoke” from the nuclear furnace at the core of the Sun [2].

    NASA and ESA claim that hydrogen is the Sun’s “fuel.” To maintain the illusion that the Sun is a ball of hydrogen, scientists claimed that solar neutrinos oscillate away before reaching our detectors. That is also untrue [3].

    The Sun exploded as a supernova 5 billion years ago [4]. That was when the Sun ejected the material that now orbits it as planets, moons, asteroids, and comets. The Sun remains erratic and violent.

    The public’s concern over global warming may expose the “house of cards” of the space science community and destroy the public’s faith in science.

    With kind regards
    Oliver K. Manuel
    http://www.omatumr.com

    References:

    1. “THE SUN: An Electro-Magnetic Plasma Diffuser that controls Earth’s climate” (A layman’s summary of the Sun’s operation with links to references of experimental observations, 2005)
    http://tinyurl.com/3ydcql

    2. “The Sun is a plasma diffuser that sorts atoms by mass”, Physics of Atomic Nuclei 69, number 11 (Nov 2006) pp. 1847-1856.
    http://tinyurl.com/yua3r5

    3. “Isotopes Tell Origin and Operation of the Sun”, AIP Conference Proceedings, volume 822 (2006) pp. 206-225.
    http://tinyurl.com/2pq6ju

    4. “Solar Abundance of Elements from Neutron-Capture Cross Sections”, The 36th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (LPSC), Houston, Texas, March 14-18, 2005
    http://tinyurl.com/2rwvvh

  2. George P. Wood Avatar

    Oliver:

    I do not have your expertise in solar physics (which is evident from the resume on your website), but if I understand you correctly, your argument is that global warming is driven by solar changes, not CO2 emissions. Is that correct?

    George

  3. Oliver K. Manuel Avatar

    That’s right, George.

    Earth is still warming from the last “Little Ice Age”, when there were few if any sunspots [1].

    The public’s interest in global warming caught space scientists, astronomers, astrophysicists, NASA, ESA, and DOE off guard, i.e., “with their pants down.”

    They had been telling the public that the Sun is a ball of hydrogen [H] with a steady, well-behaved H-fusion reactor at its core. To protect this illusion, they even claimed that solar neutrinos oscillate away before reaching our detectors.

    However, measurements showed that the Sun is erratic and violently unstable, as it has been since it exploded as a supernova 5 billion years ago throwing off all the material that now orbits the Sun as planets, moons, asteroids, and comets [2].

    Space scientists, astronomers, astrophysicists, NASA, ESA, and DOE collectively hope that you will buy the story of CO2-induced global warming.

    “Surely you don’t think the Sun controls Earth’s climate! That would be as silly as thinking a furnace influences the temperature in your home.”

    With kind regards
    Oliver K. Manuel
    http://www.omatumr.com

    ADDED REFERENCES:

    1. “Is the Earth still recovering from the ‘Little Ice Age’?””

    Click to access Earth_recovering_from_LIA_R.pdf

    2. “Superfluidity in the Solar Interior: Implications for Solar Eruptions and Climate”, Journal of Fusion Energy, volume 21 (2002) pages193-198.

    http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0501441

  4. George P. Wood Avatar

    Oliver:

    Is your view similar to that of Dennis T. Avery and S. Fred Singer, “Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 Years”?

    George

  5. Oliver K. Manuel Avatar

    George:

    My view is that space scientists, astronomers, astrophysicists, NASA, ESA, and DOE were caught off guard, i.e., “with their pants down,” by the public’s sudden interest in global warming.

    Public funds had been used to bribe scientists to “fudge” experimental data to maintain the illusion of a hydrogen-filled Sun.

    Even a child of 5 or 6 years would know to check the furnace if the house starts to get warm! The public might start checking the furnace that heats planet Earth.

    The standard model of a hydrogen-filled Sun powered by H-fusion had predicted a measurable number of electron neutrinos coming from the Sun.

    Measurements did not match the prediction; i.e., experimental data falsified the standard solar model of a hydrogen-filled Sun.

    Federal funding agencies used public tax funds to convince one hundred and seventy-eight (178) scientists to co-author a paper in 2001 claiming that data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory proved that electron neutrinos from the Sun oscillated away before reaching our detectors.

    That is the way the illusion of a hydrogen-filled Sun was maintained and the solar neutrino puzzle “solved”.

    We had already calculated that H-fusion generates less than 38% of the Sun’s energy and therefore published this challenge to the Sudbury findings:

    http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0410460

    I have not studied the papers by Avery and Singer in detail, but in following the instincts of a 5-6 year old child they are certainly on the right track.

    With kind regards
    Oliver K. Manuel
    http://www.omatumr.com

Leave a comment

Recent posts

Quote of the week

“All we have to do is decide what to do with the time given us.”

~Gandalf